The FCA’s 2026 Consumer Duty agenda — smaller firms, year-2 board reports, CP26/23, outcomes monitoring

The FCA’s 2026 Consumer Duty agenda — smaller firms, year-2 board reports, CP26/23, outcomes monitoring

The FCA’s 2026 Consumer Duty file is now a stack of official artefacts, not a new go-live: smaller-firm board-report insight on 24 February, a year-2 board-reports blog on 16 April, CP26/23 on scope and proportionality (open 29 June, comments by 18 September 2026), and an outcomes-monitoring blog on 27 July. The Duty itself has been in force since 31 July 2023, and for closed products since 31 July 2024. If you own board reporting, MI or distribution-chain oversight, the job this summer is the third-cycle report and a live consultation response — CP26/23 is still open.

Why operational teams should care

On 24 February 2026 the FCA updated its board-reports good and poor practice page with extra insight for smaller firms. On 16 April 2026 it published a year-2 blog: boards are more active, action plans have owners, data is broader — and third-cycle reports are “on the horizon”. Weak spots in that review still matter for the next pack: data that does not show outcomes, thin third-party monitoring, board minutes that do not record challenge, and light treatment of consumer understanding and support.

CP26/23 opened on 29 June 2026. It would remove business with non-UK customers from the Duty’s scope, make it clearer where the Duty applies, clarify when firms in a distribution chain can rely on each other, and explain the interaction with other product-governance rules. Comments close on 18 September 2026. A policy statement and any new rules are expected in Q1 2027. Do not treat the consultation as closed. A companion FCA blog on wholesale firms sits with CP26/23; use it as policy colour, not as a dated event.

On 27 July 2026 the FCA published an outcomes-monitoring blog and a matching good-practice page. The test is simple: what the information told you, what you did, and whether the action improved outcomes. Smaller firms can do this with a short set of indicators. You do not wait for Q1 2027 to fix that.

Requirements by business type

Business type / activity What is in play Immediate operational task Official reference
Smaller retail firms 24 February smaller-firm update; proportionate outcomes monitoring Critical friend or named Duty lead; a short MI set (complaints, feedback, service standards, file checks); document who owns the Duty if there is no board committee Board reports: good practice (smaller-firm update 24 February 2026)
Larger retail firms (banks, insurers, investments, consumer finance) Year-2 findings plus 27 July outcomes monitoring Third-cycle board report with outcomes-linked MI, named actions, and minutes that show challenge Year 2 board reports blog, 16 April 2026; outcomes-monitoring blog, 27 July 2026
Wholesale firms in a retail distribution chain CP26/23 reliance and scope proposals — still open Map where you genuinely shape retail outcomes; do not drop monitoring while the CP is open CP26/23; wholesale companion blog
Manufacturers and distributors Information-sharing across the chain What you send, what you receive, and how poor outcomes at a partner become an action Year-2 blog; outcomes monitoring: good practice
Firms serving non-UK retail customers CP26/23 territorial proposal to take that business out of scope Customer-book split (UK retail vs non-UK) for the consultation response; current rules still apply until any PS CP26/23 (opens 29 June 2026; closes 18 September 2026; PS Q1 2027)
Closed-product books Duty in force for closed products from 31 July 2024 Keep closed products in the board report; do not treat them as a finished 2024 project Board-reports page (Duty 31 July 2023; closed products 31 July 2024)

Operational tip: CP26/23 is a consultation. It does not change the Handbook this week. Build the response and the third-cycle report in parallel.

Step-by-step initial project plan

Step Action What operational staff must deliver Official reference
1 Size the firm against the 24 February material If you are small: Duty lead, critical friend, proportionate MI, record of who is accountable. If you are not: do not use “we are small” as the gap. Board-reports page, section 2, 24 February 2026
2 Gap the last board report against year 2 Four tests: data linked to outcomes; third-party monitoring; documented board challenge; consumer understanding and support, not only products and value Year-2 blog, 16 April 2026
3 Define good outcomes by journey Plain-language outcomes at join, use and leave, with indicators and thresholds you can explain Outcomes-monitoring good-practice page; 27 July blog
4 Build the third-cycle report plan Owners, data cuts, vulnerability segmentation, action tracker with dates, board-minutes template for challenge PRIN 2A.8 as described on the board-reports page; year-2 blog
5 Map CP26/23 to the book Non-UK customers; distribution-chain reliance; product-governance overlap; wholesale activities that do not shape retail outcomes CP26/23
6 Decide the consultation response Response, or a documented decision not to respond, by 18 September 2026 CP26/23 (“feedback … by 18 September 2026”)
7 Third-party and outsourcing MI What you get from TPAs, brokers and outsourcers; escalation when outcomes fail Year-2 blog; outcomes-monitoring good-practice page
8 Do not wait for the PS Q1 2027 is the expected policy statement window. No day inside that quarter is given. Fix MI and minutes now. CP26/23 next steps

Practical checklist

  • Third-cycle board report. Year 2 is done. The 16 April blog says the third cycle is on the horizon. Put the timetable in the board calendar.
  • Minutes that show challenge. Approval without questions is a stated gap. Record the questions and the follow-up.
  • Outcomes, not activity. Completing a review is not an outcome. The 27 July blog asks what happened as a result.
  • Smaller firms. A short indicator set is enough if you can explain it. Absence of complaints is not proof of good outcomes.
  • Distribution chain. You remain responsible for outcomes your product delivers. CP26/23 may change reliance rules later; it has not done so yet.
  • Non-UK customers. Map the book for the CP. Do not de-scope the Duty on a proposal.
  • Diagnostic. Use the FCA Consumer Duty diagnostic as an early gap input, then the evidence pack.
  • Closed products. Still in from 31 July 2024.

Common operational pitfalls

  • Treating CP26/23 as already in force, or as already closed. It is open until 18 September 2026.
  • Inventing a date for the wholesale companion blog. Attach it to CP26/23 without a day-lock.
  • Waiting for a Q1 2027 policy statement before improving outcomes MI.
  • Board reports that list metrics and do not say what they mean for customers.
  • Aggregating “vulnerable customers” into one bucket with no drivers.
  • Action lists with no owner, no date, and no test of whether the fix worked.
  • Folding other 2026 FCA files into this pack. This post is the Duty agenda only.

How GRT Consulting can help

GRT Consulting supports operational teams with:

  • Third-cycle Consumer Duty board-report design, including smaller-firm proportionate packs
  • Outcomes-monitoring frameworks against the 27 July good-practice findings
  • Distribution-chain information maps and third-party MI
  • CP26/23 book-mapping and consultation responses (close 18 September 2026)
  • Board-minute and action-tracker templates that show challenge and effect

Start with the free FCA Consumer Duty diagnostic if you need a first cut.

Contact us for a focused readiness review: T: +44 20 3695 9251 E: info@grtconsult.com Web: grtconsult.com


Sources

.., 29th July 2026

GRT Consulting

Speak to us about how we can help you

T: +44 20 3695 9251

E: info@grtconsult.com

Submit Request for Proposal